Quick Sort Animation with Python and Turtle (with Source Code)

Merge Sort algorithm is fast but it requires additional array and additional copying. Quick Sort is even faster than Merge Sort. Implement Quick Sort algorithm and animate it!

Here is the source code:

import turtle
import random
import time

screen = turtle.Screen()
screen.setup(1000,1000)
screen.tracer(0,0)
screen.title('Quick Sort Animation - PythonTurtle.Academy')
turtle.speed(0)
turtle.hideturtle()

def draw_bar(x,y,w,h):
    turtle.up()
    turtle.goto(x,y)
    turtle.seth(0)
    turtle.down()
    turtle.begin_fill()
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.end_fill()

def draw_bars(v,n,currenti=-1,currentj=-1):
    turtle.clear()
    x = -400
    w = 800/n
    for  i in range(n):
        if i == currenti: turtle.fillcolor('red')
        elif i == currentj: turtle.fillcolor('blue')
        else: turtle.fillcolor('gray')
        draw_bar(x,-400,w,v[i])
        x += w
    screen.update()

def partition(v,x,y):
    p = random.randint(x,y)
    v[p], v[y] = v[y], v[p]
    pivot = v[y]
    i, j = x, y-1
    while i <= j:
        while v[i] <= pivot and i <= j:
            draw_bars(v,n,i,j)
            i += 1
        while v[j] > pivot and j >= i:
            draw_bars(v,n,i,j)
            j -= 1
        if i < j:
            draw_bars(v,n,i,j)
            v[i], v[j] = v[j], v[i]
    v[i], v[y] = v[y], v[i]
    draw_bars(v,n,i,y)
    return i

def quick_sort(v,x,y):
    if x >= y:
        return
    m = partition(v,x,y)
    quick_sort(v,x,m-1)
    quick_sort(v,m+1,y)
    
n = 50
v = [0] * n
for i in range(n):
    v[i] = random.randint(1,800)

t1 = time.time()
quick_sort(v,0,n-1)
turtle.clear()
draw_bars(v,n,-1)
turtle.update()
t2 = time.time()
print('elapsed time=', t2-t1)

Merge Sort Animation with Python and Turtle (with Source Code)

In previous sorting animations, we animated selection, insertion, and bubble sort. They are slow O(n^2) slow sorting algorithm. Merge Sort, a divide and conquer algorithm, is a much faster sorting algorithm with the worst case running time of O(n*logn). However, unlike previous sorting algorithms, it requires another array to be able to merge. Implement Merge Sorting and animate it!

Here is the source code:

import turtle
import random
import time

screen = turtle.Screen()
screen.setup(1000,1000)
screen.setworldcoordinates(-1000,-1000,1000,1000)
screen.tracer(0,0)
screen.title('Merge Sort Animation - PythonTurtle.Academy')
turtle.speed(0)
turtle.hideturtle()

def draw_bar(x,y,w,h):
    turtle.up()
    turtle.goto(x,y)
    turtle.seth(0)
    turtle.down()
    turtle.begin_fill()
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.end_fill()

def draw_bars(v,w,n,currenti=-1,currentj=-1):
    turtle.clear()
    x = -400
    wd = 800/n
    for  i in range(n):
        if i == currenti: turtle.fillcolor('red')
        elif i == currentj: turtle.fillcolor('blue')
        else: turtle.fillcolor('gray')
        draw_bar(x,100,wd,v[i])
        x += wd
        
    x = -400
    for  i in range(n):
        turtle.fillcolor('gray')
        draw_bar(x,-900,wd,w[i])
        x += wd
    screen.update()

def merge(v,w,a,b,x,y):
    i,j, k = a,x,a
    while i<=b and j<=y:
        if v[i] < v[j]: w[k],i = v[i], i+1
        else: w[k], j = v[j], j+1
        draw_bars(v,w,n,i,j)
        k += 1
    while i<=b:
        w[k],i,k = v[i],i+1,k+1
        draw_bars(v,w,n,i,j)
    while j<=y:
        w[k],j,k = v[j],j+1,k+1
        draw_bars(v,w,n,i,j)
    for i in range(a,y+1):
        v[i] = w[i]
        draw_bars(v,w,n,i)
    
def merge_sort(v,w,x,y):
    if x >= y:
        return
    m = (x+y)//2
    merge_sort(v,w,x,m)
    merge_sort(v,w,m+1,y)
    merge(v,w,x,m,m+1,y)
    
n = 50
v = [0] * n
w = [0] * n
for i in range(n):
    v[i] = random.randint(1,800)

t1 = time.time()
merge_sort(v,w,0,n-1)
t2 = time.time()
print('elapsed time=', t2-t1)

What’s Next?

Quick Sort Animation

Selection Sort Animation with Python and Turtle (Source Code Included)

Generate 50 random numbers and draw them as bars. Following the steps of selection sort algorithm and redraw the bar every single step to show how bubble sort works.

Compare against Bubble Sort and Insertion Sort. Which is the fastest? Which is the slowest?

Source Code:

import turtle
import random
import time

screen = turtle.Screen()
screen.setup(1000,1000)
screen.tracer(0,0)
screen.title('Selection Sort Animation - PythonTurtle.Academy')
turtle.speed(0)
turtle.hideturtle()

def draw_bar(x,y,w,h):
    turtle.up()
    turtle.goto(x,y)
    turtle.seth(0)
    turtle.down()
    turtle.begin_fill()
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.end_fill()

def draw_bars(v,n,current):
    x = -400
    w = 800/n
    for  i in range(n):
        if i == current: turtle.fillcolor('red')
        else: turtle.fillcolor('gray')
        draw_bar(x,-400,w,v[i])
        x += w

def select_smallest(v,i,k):
    smallest = v[i]
    smallest_index = i
    for j in range(i+1,k):
        if v[j] < smallest:
            smallest = v[j]
            smallest_index = j
        turtle.clear()
        draw_bars(v,n,j)
        turtle.update()
    return smallest_index
        
def selection_sort(v,k):
    for i in range(k-1):
        j = select_smallest(v,i,k) # smallest index from ith to last
        v[i], v[j] = v[j], v[i] # swap with the smallest
        turtle.clear()
        draw_bars(v,n,i)
        turtle.update()
        
n = 50
v = [0] * n
for i in range(n):
    v[i] = random.randint(1,800)

t1 = time.time()
selection_sort(v,n)
turtle.clear()
draw_bars(v,n,-1)
turtle.update()
t2 = time.time()
print('elapsed time=', t2-t1)

Insertion Sort Animation with Python and Turtle (Source Code Included)

Generate 50 random numbers and draw them as bars. Following the steps of insertion sort algorithm and redraw the bar every single step to show how bubble sort works.

Compare against Bubble Sort. Which is faster?

Source Code:

import turtle
import random
import time

screen = turtle.Screen()
screen.setup(1000,1000)
screen.tracer(0,0)
screen.title('Insertion Sort Animation - PythonTurtle.Academy')
turtle.speed(0)
turtle.hideturtle()

def draw_bar(x,y,w,h):
    turtle.up()
    turtle.goto(x,y)
    turtle.seth(0)
    turtle.down()
    turtle.fillcolor('gray')
    turtle.begin_fill()
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(w)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.fd(h)
    turtle.left(90)
    turtle.end_fill()

def draw_bars(v,n):
    x = -400
    w = 800/n
    for  i in range(n):
        draw_bar(x,-400,w,v[i])
        x += w

def insert(v,k):
    x = v[k]
    for i in range(k-1,-1,-1):
        if v[i] > x: v[i+1] = v[i]
        else:
            v[i+1] = x
            return
        turtle.clear()
        draw_bars(v,n)
        screen.update()
    v[0] = x
    
def insertion_sort(v,k):
    if k == 1: return
    insertion_sort(v,k-1)
    insert(v,k-1)
    
n = 50
v = [0] * n
for i in range(n):
    v[i] = random.randint(1,800)

t1 = time.time()
insertion_sort(v,n)
t2 = time.time()
print('elapsed time=', t2-t1)